Conservative scholars have long chafed at the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. NRDC, which held that a court may not substitute its own interpretation of a statute over a reasonable one by the regulatory agency. For this deference to apply, the court must first find that the statute is ambiguous, and then that the agency interpreted it reasonably.
“He’s on record as saying for major rulemakings, Chevron ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.